Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people. Others think that it is causing the opposite effect.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is argued by a significant number of individuals that variety of automation present in the world is maximizing the difference between rich and poor people. Whereas others consider that it is doing the reverse. Before concluding, this essay will discuss both the ideas.
Advanced technology is developing the world without discrimination in many ways and making the world a small global village. Technology has a major role to play in bridging the gap between poor and rich; for instance, internet development has benefited everyone in irrespective of their economic background such as, sharing knowledge or gaining information with the help of internet is quite easy these days in cheaper rates. Besides, e-learning techniques are profitable for everybody, where students read material from online books and can acquire in-depth knowledge of subjects eventually make themselves educated with spending little amount.
On the other hand, there are certain aspects where only the rich are taking advantage of technology and increasing the gaps between wealthy and underprivileged people. For instance, the luxury lifestyle supported by technology is making the rich more sophisticated, whereas poor people are still at the same position such as cars and aeroplanes, where rich can have a better taste with the growing technology and become more advanced by living luxuries lifestyle as compared with economical people. Recently, the introduction of robots in daily life by scientists has made the gap wider between rich and poor.
To conclude, different segments of technology has different roles to play in between rich and poor. Some are minimizing the gap and others are increasing. However, it is to believe that in future, the gaps will decrease between rich and poor people with the support of technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ifference between rich and poor people. Whereas others consider that it is doing the re...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'luxuries'' or 'luxury's'?
Suggestion: luxuries'; luxury's
...logy and become more advanced by living luxuries lifestyle as compared with economical p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...reasing. However, it is to believe that in future, the gaps will decrease between rich an...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, still, whereas, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41901408451 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8779024403 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566901408451 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.8465755356 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263215740138 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103686622831 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586433262856 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171543215654 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740509729409 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.