Some people think that robots can improve human life in future while others think roots may affect society in a bad way. Discuss both the viewpoints and give your opinion.
Since last some decade,Technological advancement erupted tremendously. A section of society believes that machine can amend life of people in the future. However, other section of society believes that it will affect adversely. In my discourse ahead, I will discuss both the arguments and give my unbiased opinion before reaching to a reasonable conclusion.
The main advantage is that it will ease life of human in every way. Introduction of robot in coming years will change the way of work, whether, it is house hold , office work or for the use of military personals as it is time-saving. A machine can do any work in half of the time than men can do. It works with 100 percent efficiently and with fewer error . For example, medical fields are taking benefit with it, few personnel and efficient work in just half of the time as compared to earlier days where it was time-consuming.
On the other hand, there are some who believes that it will have a negative impact. The for-most reason being, the society will become slug to do any work by themselves. It will affect the imagination power , efficiency and health of the people. Secondly, replacement of human with machines will lead to unemployment . For example, begin use of computers had a negative impact on manual writings.
To sump up, both has their own pros and cons of this issue. As per my opinion society it has more advantages than disadvantages to the society. For million people it can be a blessing. Hence, it will ultimately be progressive for the society in the coming years. After all, excess usage of anything come with heavy cost.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Technological
Since last some decade,Technological advancement erupted tremendously. A se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e way of work, whether, it is house hold , office work or for the use of military ...
^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...percent efficiently and with fewer error . For example, medical fields are taking ...
^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun personnel seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little personnel'.
Suggestion: little personnel
...ical fields are taking benefit with it, few personnel and efficient work in just half of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...es. It will affect the imagination power , efficiency and health of the people. S...
^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... with machines will lead to unemployment . For example, begin use of computers had...
^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... their own pros and cons of this issue. As per my opinion society it has more adva...
^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... than disadvantages to the society. For million people it can be a blessing. Hence, it ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, after all, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85144927536 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86288485516 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4528236886 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.4736842105 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5263157895 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167931584108 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551442559127 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445672541996 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10777658586 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565147080494 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.