Some people think that robots can improve human life in future while others think roots may affect society in a bad way. Discuss both the viewpoints and give your opinion.
Technological advancement has been erupted since last decade tremendously. A section of society believes that machine can amend life of people in the future. However, other section of society believes that it will affect adversely. In my discourse ahead, I will discuss both the arguments and give my unbiased opinion before reaching to a reasonable conclusion.
The main advantage is that it will ease life of human in every way. Introduction of robot in coming years will change the way of work, whether, it is house hold , office work or for the use of military personals as it is time-saving. A machine can do any work in half of the time than men can do. It works with 100 percent efficiently and with fewer error . For example, medical fields are taking benefit with it, few manpower and efficient work in just half of the time as compared to earlier days where it was time consuming.
On the other hand, there are some who believes that it will have a negative impact. The for-most reason being, the society will become slug to do any work by themselves. It will affect the imagination power , efficiency and health of the people. Secondly, replacement of human with machines will lead to unemployment . For example, the introduction of computers had a negative impact on manual writings.
To sump up, both has their own pros and cons of this issue. As per my opinion society it has more advantages than disadvantages to the society as a whole. It can be a blessing for millions of people. Hence, it will ultimately be progressive for the society in the coming years. After all, excess usage of anything come with heavy cost.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e that machine can amend life of people in future. However, other section of society is s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... affect adversely. In my discourse ahead , I will discuss both the arguments and g...
^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... 100 percent efficiently and error less as it design for that purpose. For example...
^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'designs'?
Suggestion: designs
...ercent efficiently and error less as it design for that purpose. For example, medical ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple, medical field are taking benefit of this by doing surgeries with the help of...
^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , efficiency
...t results lost imagination power of mind,efficiency and bad health. Secondly, replacement w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lth. Secondly, replacement with machines ought to loss of job almost in every fie...
^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: increasing
...tion of computer impact adversely cause to increase unemployment. To sump up, it have th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...ncrease unemployment. To sump up, it have their own pros and cons of this issue. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'results'?
Suggestion: results
...sings for millions of people. Hence, it result ultimately progress the life of people ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, after all, for example, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82236842105 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74756054612 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595394736842 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.933971222 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.3 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217887254933 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581539105794 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613589876928 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126966124231 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423758295677 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.08 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.