some government say how many children a family can have in their country. They may control the number of children someone has through taxes. It is sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in this way.
Over population in developing country and under developed country having significant role in terms of economy development. Sometime require to inculcat prominent steps through charging penalties in monetary way to control children birth by the national authorities which will rightful to curb the population. I completely agree with the given statement. In the discourse ahead, along with the given idea favoring of my opinion, I will also state contradictory view which other people in society might have.
There are number of benefits society can get if government can control the birth rate, out of which I will state most crucial advantages. Firstly, to curb over population, increase the living standard of the people. A limited numbers may helpful to create job rate, better quality of basic requirements, finer facilities people can get in society, government can use optimum resources of the society etc. Secondly, parents do irrigate values and ethics in children so that it helps to create healthy environment in society. By encouraging people for single child in a family getting benefits from the government. For example, China not only giving tax benefits who have lesser number of children in family but also providing free education and other monetary benefits through which China had control over birth rate by 0.6% per annum, report published by China Government.
On the flip side, there are certain people who tend to believe that contain control over population is not necessary. To begin with, over population rise imbalance in the economy and in society as well. There are certain countries in which lack of population, limit the growth rate of economy due to limited resources available like Japan where government encourage local public to increase the birth rate will provide benefits by the government. Moreover, it is very personal decision of family that how many children they want to conceive as thinking are differ from person to person. It is not advisable that government should interfere in it and create dispute in people. They, perhaps, oppose this decision of ruling authority can rise rebellions in own country.
To conclude, there evidently are those in society who are convince of their belief that government many should not control the birth rate through levy taxes and the have their rightful reasons to back their conviction. I, however, am of the view that government should take require steps to curb the number of children through implying taxes but also should maintain male and female ratio for the benefit of the society. After all we people are responsible to create finer society which pass on to generation to generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 855, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e by 0.6% per annum, report published by China Government. On the flip side, t...
^^
Line 5, column 558, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'differed'.
Suggestion: differed
...n they want to conceive as thinking are differ from person to person. It is not advisa...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...e, there evidently are those in society who are convince of their belief that governmen...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'convinced'.
Suggestion: convinced
... evidently are those in society who are convince of their belief that government many sh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 422, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e ratio for the benefit of the society. After all we people are responsible to create...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 496, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to generation'.
Suggestion: to generation
...e to create finer society which pass on to generation to generation.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, after all, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 41.998997996 179% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 432.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21759259259 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64539483907 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509259259259 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 721.8 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0299233945 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.631578947 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7368421053 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315569414956 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839842456918 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065137105706 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18811077983 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355745986778 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.