Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell food or drinks that are scientifically proven to be bad for people's health.
Do you agree or disagree?
How to choose the products which are not harmful to human health is a significant social issues that is mostly concerned about. In fact, although it is difficult to find benign products in modern life, there are still available some scientifically warned to be bad for people’s health. Some people point that government should pass the legislation about prevent shops from selling food are drinks which is proven to be harmful for people’s health by science. I partly agree with that view, it is necessity for citizens to have a protection from toxic products.
Absolutely, we can not deny that people who consume food contains minimum quantity of nutrients and high amount of harmful contents have a higher proportion to developing illness such as disease and some form of cancers. Afterwards, it may not direct affect to consumers but it may harm the following generation. In more details, pregnant women digest toxic products then this effects to the fetus. This could be the factors leads to mutation. Thus, shops should be banned from selling toxic food or drinks which are proven scientifically.
In contracts, the implication of modernization is people lack of time to prepare a nutritious. In fact, customers tend to buy fast and convenient food and drinks. However, this kind of products formerly contains a high quantity of toxic which affect negative impacts to people’s health. Though its harm, vast majority of citizens still shop these because there are not any alternative products.
In conclusion, banning shops to sell products which have bad impacts to citizens’ health is essential. Beside that, increasing awareness of customers about the harm of these food and drinks is also required.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'issue'?
Suggestion: issue
...to human health is a significant social issues that is mostly concerned about. In fact...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 82, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ation is people lack of time to prepare a nutritious. In fact, customers tend to buy fast an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 174, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...wareness of customers about the harm of these food and drinks is also required.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27697841727 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87179250196 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561151079137 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8025959753 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342515247402 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109432280618 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116715727776 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206117200838 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105970083747 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.