Some people think that studying history is a waste of time while others think it is essential to learn history.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
According to few people, learning history is of no use, while others believe that history is important. In my opinion, I agree with the statement that getting familiar with history could provide the logical reasons behind all the major events happened in the past and also the key inventions which are being used today.
On the one hand, the most significant approach to learn history is that it gives an in-depth information of our ancestors. it could show us their way of living by which we could get more knowledge regarding our culture and norms. Then, most of the life changing creations were done in past and by history, we can understand the needs and behaviours of that time foundations which leads to current life changing technology. For instance, the invention of telephone have become so important that recently they thought of a device which could be available with every individual which cemented the base for smartphones of today.
On the other hand, there are few people who advocate the idea that learning history will have no benefits. they might think that because history is hard to understand. Analysing countless timelines and their connection with the events are confusing at times. In other words, people belongs to 21st century are not familiar with the past on which history is based and this makes history more difficult. Another possible reason might be the practical use of historical information as the advancement in all aspects of life have totally changed the way of living as compared to the history.
In conclusion, avoid learning history might have some minor benefits but the advantages of being up-todate with the past is countless as it can bring betterment for today and the time to come.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
According to few people, learning history is of no u...
^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... in-depth information of our ancestors. it could show us their way of living by wh...
^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...could be available with every individual which cemented the base for smartphones ...
^^
Line 6, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...learning history will have no benefits. they might think that because history is har...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58598619748 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555172413793 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7568392842 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.833333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176546974732 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725930666389 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589140904444 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111500499029 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400674485494 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.