Some people think that there are things individual can do to help prevent global climate change. Other believe that action by individual is useless and irrelevant and that it is only government and large business which can make it different.
Distance both these views and give your opinion
In the modern World, people are living in contaminated surrounding, which are the main causes of global warming. Hence, every year 1°C temperature is augmenting day by day globally. Some people assert that regime and large enterprises can do some actions to prevent global climate rather than individuals. However, I agree with the formal statement and in this essay, I will portray both the views along with my opinion in the subsequent segments.
As far as my views are concerned, government should curb the problem very effectively. Predominantly, legal bodies should make the severe rules to wiping out the ambience, is they ward off their citizens from the detrimental affects of polluted surroundings. If anyone unable to follow the rules then they should give the penalty to the regime. Moreover government should urge the people for pollution free world. Theyshould organise the seminars to wear about ill-affects of pollution. In addition, large companies should make the proper drainage system for the wastage of their industries. By doing this, they prohibited the pollution from spreading in the world. Due to this the climate problem will automatically overcome.
On the paradoxical side, there are umpteen in reasons which are propitious with the some persons viewpoints. Primarily, individual can emphasis on using the recycle bags instead of poly bags, which are one of the main cause of pollution. For instance, people can prefer to use recycle bags in their daily life. So, that they can cut down the usage of plastic bags. If fewer plastic bags will use, it means less air pollution, which is caused by the burning of plastic bags in the rubbish dump sites.
To recapitulate, I reiterate my opinion that government can effectively make the world pollution free by making strict laws. How are ever, it not mere the responsibility of regime, individual can also contribute the helping them in reducing the environment problems. Moreover, I cogitate that, there is a used to understand the gravity of the issue and address it immediately before it gets too late.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ental affects of polluted surroundings. If anyone unable to follow the rules then ...
^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... should give the penalty to the regime. Moreover government should urge the people for p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...n reasons which are propitious with the some persons viewpoints. Primarily, individu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o use recycle bags in their daily life. So, that they can cut down the usage of plastic ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16224188791 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81040298957 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58407079646 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4888827139 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.95 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2437988746 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647318643386 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717321658831 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140818582168 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517783880382 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.