Some people think that young people should be ambitious Others believe that it is fine if young people do not have big aims in life Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Some say that children should be Ambitious, while some argued that it is fine not to have a big goal in their life. I believe they should have a clear future goal to succeed in their life.

On the one hand, Some individuals believe that having a clear-cut goal would not aid them to achieve their aims. Many things will change with time, therefore, People faced difficulty while trying to fulfill their dream which they have planned, and fail to achieve that, and in the end, they might feel unhappy with their pre-planning theory. For Example, In the UK, Many international graduates enrolled themself in the management course for a rosy future in corporate fields, but unfortunately, the government changed their immigration rules, as a result, many students have to flee back to their home country. However, I believe that future goals can help people to clear their ways for their subsequent life.

On the other hand, It is thought that adolescents should be ambitious. It will accelerate their ways to accomplish their future plan and clear out their pathway in the long run. For instance, the corporate world wants to hire someone, who has an objective in their life because they can support the organization to achieve its subsequent growth and produces a tangible impact on others. I believe this ultimate goal will rise a person in their personal and professional life because it helps to ensure their forthcoming perspective.

In conclusion, although Human beings can live a successful life without any aims, objective allows them to build a better future and inspired future generations.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04511278195 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67823306133 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556390977444 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5669888933 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141732563098 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757116342171 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615977103953 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103072106114 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692555461124 0.056905535591 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04511278195 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67823306133 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556390977444 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5669888933 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141732563098 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757116342171 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615977103953 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103072106114 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692555461124 0.056905535591 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.