Some people think that zoos are cruel and that all zoos should be closed. However, others think that zoos are useful for protecting rare animals.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Time is changing and are the standpoints of people from all walks of life whether sustaining animals in zoos would be acceptable or not. Although it is advocated by some that zoos ought to be shut down inasmuch as confining miserably poor animals there is feasibly cruel, it will be proven by this essay that this may not be the case. Throughout the following paragraphs, the undeniable virtue of preserving animals in zoos from extinction will be meticulously scrutinized to rationally support this logical viewpoint.
On the one side, the zoo concept has refuted by some since it is argued that defenseless animals would be illtreated by restricting them in a densely populated prison. Take an African lion, maintained in a conspicuously small cage just to keep it safe from some unlikely environmental threats, as an illustration. Without a shadow of a doubt, this can catalyze a range of adverse consequences, both physically and mentally, for the miserable animal. Hence, it can be clearly understood by this glaringly apparent instance that zoos are cruel and all of them should be closed. However, this essay is not agreed with this opinion.
On the other hand, whilst zoos can have some devastating ramifications on their animals, it is adequately irrefutable that some rare animals protected in zoos can be immune from the serious jeopardy of extinction. Preserving giant pandas, in china’s zoos, is a clarifying example of the possible boons of protecting some animals to the brink of extinction thanks to zoos. This instance clearly proves that not only zoos must not be banned but it is obligatory to be supported by governments the world over. Thus assuming that zoos are cruel seems superficial.
To recapitulate, after shedding a light on the zoo issue, it deems that it can act as a precursor to preserve some species have been extinct as time goes by. It is, therefore, hoped this significant point will be taken into consideration into the foreseeable future in the sake of animal’s survival.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nally support this logical viewpoint. On the one side, the zoo concept has ref...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssay is not agreed with this opinion. On the other hand, whilst zoos can have ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat zoos are cruel seems superficial. To recapitulate, after shedding a light ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07784431138 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00668575055 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565868263473 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4343129042 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.142857143 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305791033758 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112346947395 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722509562374 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18777314905 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712323688568 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.