Some people use technology to take advice for their medical problems rather than seeing a doctor. Why this is so? Is it a positive or negative development according to you?
In the era of digitization, people often rely on technology for medical assistance instead of seeing an actual doctor or expert because of its easy accessibility. In my opinion, I believe that it is surely helpful to refer websites for common illness but certainly not advisable in case of serious sickness where implication could be quite severe.
There are several reasons behind this new trend. To begin with, not only online consultant is more convenient, because it can be access anywhere and anytime, but also offers an excellent value for money. Increasing number of experts’ blog on the internet, which provides elaborate details about sickness and its prevention, so people can easily refer and act according to the advises. Thus, many people avoid visiting a doctor rather they prefer to check information online.
Such development can certainly have upside but limited to particular common problems, Take for an example of cold and cough where it is quite convenient to refer a website then to see a doctor and put a burden on insurance. In this way, people can take precautionary actions before it may fall out of hand when they visit hospitals as precaution is better than cure. Thus, technology can be exploited to common health issues.
However, it is certainly not advisable in case of serious illness where implication of ignorance can be quite critical. Most of the information which is available at free of cost is generic that means it is irrelevant to a particular with specific disorder. Moreover, online consultant is completely unaware about the previous medical history or individual immune system, which makes following online prescription very dangerous. In short, reliance on technology can be a threat in case of deadly diseases.
In conclusion, reliance on technology is surely helpful in common problems but major illness always require proper investigation before treatment. Thus, instead of following blind steps, people should visit hospital and get thorough check up.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, in conclusion, in short, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29906542056 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86728606416 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582554517134 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0371287903 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.4 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187135834921 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573368115601 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470210727098 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100963240167 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047505600248 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.