Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that ex-prisoner can become productive and responsible member of the society. While one segment argues that interaction of teenagers with such people should be promoted, another segment is not in agreement with the trend.
Law offenders had already experienced prison life and they are in better position to speak about how they became involved in crime, prison and criminal lifestyle. Teenagers are going to learn in great deal from their mistakes and more likely to accept advice from them. Reformed offenders can dispel any false ideas too, that the young group may have about criminals living a flamboyant and luxurious lifestyle. While adolescents may not pay enough attention to the guidance from older people, I imagine most of them will be keen to hear the stories of the ex-criminals. The vivid and perhaps shocking nature of the stories is likely to have a powerful impact.
On the other hand, people who oppose the trend argue that younger population might fancy becoming a gangster after knowing about the stories of prisoners and their lifestyle. Thus, better constructive and fundamental measures will be useful. For instance, one option that schools and colleges could invite the police to speak about consequences of breaking the law in the society which will be perceived as a learning. Another option, the teachers speaking to students about crimes and imparting necessary education. Finally, films can be informative and provides holistic view for improved vigilance and awareness.
In conclusion, it is a nice idea of having teens having conversation with people who have become a law abiding citizen after completing their sentence since it is going to deter them from committing crimes. However, one need to ensure that teens are informed about issues of breaking law by other means as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enagers are going to learn in great deal from their mistakes and more likely to a...
^^
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ructive and fundamental measures will be useful. For instance, one option that ...
^^
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... measures will be useful. For instance, one option that schools and colleges co...
^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... useful. For instance, one option that schools and colleges could invite the p...
^^
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t schools and colleges could invite the police to speak about consequences of br...
^^
Line 4, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...perceived as a learning. Another option, the teachers speaking to students about ...
^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of breaking law by other means as well.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18918918919 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64629480349 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591216216216 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4222609916 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.714285714 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187826597962 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580968705551 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568242582172 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116765143403 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291520323688 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.