Preposterous discussions have been made in the past to cease whether work for same organisation throughout life or work for different organisation. This essay will act as ruminator and seek to explicate both the aspect of arguments so that a plausible conclusion can be formed.
In past, most of the people do work for some organisation throughout their working life. There are some basic points to consider this aspect. Firstly, working for same organisation for number of years gives you immense respect and honor everyone desire. By working for the same employer you are making efforts for your organisation to grow further. Secondly, with growth of the company your growth in terms of financial and positional benefits tend to increase. Thirdly, people hesitate to gel up with different office environment more often, so they are very reluctant to changing their whole life around. It is for these reasons some people work for their entire life or same employer.
In modern age, people are very much enthusiastic and impatient. They need results very quick, so if their financial or stature needs are not served they will head for other organisation. There are some points I like to discuss here. Firstly, today's generation are very specific about their goals and what they want to do in their professional life. So if they are not satisfied with their work they will look for other prospects, Secondly, sufficient raise against their work is not awarded they will search for other job who offers handsome pay. Thus, changing job once in a while is completely a personal choice.
After the incisive discussion I would like to say, working for different organisations has its benefits, it enhances one's professional as well as technical skills to another level. Meeting new people and environment can surely boost one's career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
... plausible conclusion can be formed. In past, most of the people do work for some or...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...nisations has its benefits, it enhances ones professional as well as technical skill...
^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...people and environment can surely boost ones career.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1096345515 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70690938483 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56146179402 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5096773025 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4705882353 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.507861932464 0.244688304435 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168035773619 0.084324248473 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158025287983 0.0667982634062 237% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302900331379 0.151304729494 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129024990849 0.056905535591 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.