Many people argue that it is a responsibility of the government to provide houses to people who do not have enough funds to buy them. I do not agree with the statement, as the government is already burdened with many other social responsibilities, a better solution for this is the authority can help to lower the cost of housing facilities and make them more affordable.
The argument that the governing bodies are responsible for providing houses to its citizen do not seem a viable option. Already there is a lot of financial burden on the government like Healthcare, Education, Transportation and Defence. However, to own a home is really important for everyone, but making it a government's responsibility is not feasible.
There is a better alternative for this situation that can help to reach expected results. Government can make affordable houses by providing a piece of land at a lower cost to the builders. Affordability issues could be overcome by limiting the amenities as well. For instance, in Ahmedabad, the Municipal Corporation have built a number of houses with just few basic amenities, and such action has benefited a lot of people. So when a construction rate is cut down to half, many people will be able to buy their own house and they do not have to rely on anyone.
In conclusion, home is a basic necessity, but there are other more important issues as well where government fund are more necessary. So,instead of providing free homes, lowering the cost of housing facilities, can help people in the society to buy homes for themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...important for everyone, but making it a governments responsibility is not feasible. Ther...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , instead
...e government fund are more necessary. So,instead of providing free homes, lowering the c...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, really, so, well, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9320754717 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06077051194 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535849056604 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6778695665 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.916666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359291434429 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131965279992 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825799522061 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225138702887 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729792596084 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.