Some say that rich countries should help poor countries with trade, health and education. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience.
The wealth of a nation is its people. Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. It is argued that the governments of developed nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. This essay totally agrees with this argument.
Firstly, giving financial help to poor nations makes excellent business sense. When poor nations develop, the purchasing power of their people will increase. This provides a great opportunity for rich nations. By helping the poor grow, they can increase their wealth too. For example, China helps African countries to develop their infrastructure, so African countries buy major goods from only china.
Secondly, rich nations have excess funds. By giving financial aid to poor nations, they can improve the living standards. In other words, poverty is the root cause of many anti-social activities. The poor, in general, are unhappy with their own lives. They are also angry with the rich, and many of them have criminal tendencies. It is not possible to reform them without improving their living standards. By providing financial assistance to poor nations, the rich countries can alleviate poverty in those nations and make the world a more peaceful place to live in.
In conclusion, when rich nations give financial assistance to poor nations, they are not only being generous but also helping their own industries and people. Therefore, in my opinion, nations that have excess funds should use them for the betterment of poor nations as it is a win-win situation for both.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in general, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66825183802 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3756834156 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.6666666667 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2222222222 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207675104797 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675543220708 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418056442283 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136084147932 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028267670765 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.