Some students take a year off between school and university, to work or to travel. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
It is argued that a fraction of students prefer to take a year off from studies and spend this time in traveling or working. Although there are certain disadvantages associated with this trend yet the upsides overweigh the downsides in this case.
To begin, there are numerous drawbacks related to this trend. The most significant is that it distracts the pupil from the study. In other words, students could not be able to give their full attention on learning as they need additional to settle down and this eventually worse their productivity. According to a recent report, published in a newspaper, a ratio of 51% of students who took a year gap from educational institutions do not able to resume their academic career in an effective manner.
Nevertheless, the benefits of this thought are far more than drawbacks. First of all, it guides a learner that what course would be beneficial for his future. For instance, if a scholar while doing any work or traveling realizes the value of a specific course, such as during roaming various parts an individual came to know that becoming a guide is an outstanding opportunity rather than other trends. Hence, this way, this approach can assist a person to grab contemporary opportunities.
Another gigantic positive aspect is that missing a year from academic classes gives a chance to explore the world or to earn money to support the expenditures. An academic student’s wisdom reinforces while doing work on his own, during the break. Several lessons sharpen the mind of a pupil after these practical lessons. Apart from this, sometimes a person’s mind is tired from regular classes and a short stint away from these aides to regain the original status.
In conclusion, education is an integral part of one’s life and taking a year off from schools and universities are profitable, despite some negative aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 477, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective manner" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ot able to resume their academic career in an effective manner. Nevertheless, the benefits of this th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, nevertheless, so, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10037174721 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89735398372 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646840148699 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5826619481 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.538461538 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194920402737 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585607787576 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491348974475 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115342171819 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360595983384 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.