Some think the current generation should take steps to protect the environment for the next generation.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an opinion that modern people should protect the environment for future generations. I completely agree with this notion because human beings should take responsibility for their actions and have a vision of what the future holds for their ancestors.
It is true that environmental issues today have reached a certain level when they cannot be ignored. In fact, if humanity does not take immediate action for the protection of the environment, it is possible that the next generation will meet the ecological catastrophe. As a result, the level of diseases and death related to the ecological situation will increase. In addition, mammals and other species will be affected along with vegetation. It is obvious that a large number of animals and plants will be on the brink of extinction, not to mention the survival of humankind as a whole.
As well as all mentioned above reasons, authorities and the public should be fully aware and responsible for the consequences of their actions for the environment. Everyone should take responsibility for the natural heritage because the next generation is our blood and flesh and they should not suffer due to our irresponsible actions. For instance, it would be unfair for the future citizens, if the current generation in pursuit of material goods destroyed the natural habitats of animals and left behind the extremely polluted atmosphere, soils, and the global ocean.
In conclusion, I fully agree that the present-day generation should take action in order to protect the environment for the next generation because contemporary people are responsible for the natural heritage they will leave after them in order to make sure that their ancestors will not suffer from severe ecological issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ong with vegetation. It is obvious that a large number of animals and plants will be on the brink...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 573, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tmosphere, soils, and the global ocean. In conclusion, I fully agree that the pr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24822695035 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90565566912 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517730496454 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.8799410641 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.545454545 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286052291246 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108123169658 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916995717271 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1912562316 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645033930563 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.