These days, technology has improved in many sector to facilitate human to fulfilled their daily needs. This including agriculture that shown significant development of compared to the past, where we have to do something with our own hands. But this is not meant every people had prosperous life, there are still so many people that suffers from hunger.
Something that may came up to our mind is when the high-technology has been provided, people from all over the country will overcome its hunger. However, this was not always the case. The technology is not available yet in all over the country, frequently it is applicable in progressive area where almost all the machinery was invented there. Way to get to remote area or town may not easily accessible or too expensive to be distributed the machinery.
As the time passed by, human works are replaced by automation that aimed to simply human, but this bring something bad. It can be seen that many people are fired because the company thought the robot is way more quicker and cheaper to afford, instead of hiring a human. Moroever, robot has infinite energy which can simply be recharged, differ from human who can get tired. If the unemployed could not find any work soon, then there is no salary, meanwhile they have to buy main needs such food to continue their life. From this situation, it will lead to a starvation.
In my opinion, government should increase their sensitivity to this problem because agriculture produce important needs. One of many ways that can be done is providing the advances to all over the country equally. Other than that, there has to be a wide job field that could employ someone who get fired from the previous job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun sector seems to be countable; consider using: 'many sectors'.
Suggestion: many sectors
These days, technology has improved in many sector to facilitate human to fulfilled their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'quicker' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: quicker
...se the company thought the robot is way more quicker and cheaper to afford, instead of hirin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anwhile they have to buy main needs such food to continue their life. From this s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, then, while, as to, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81632653061 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55134691788 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602040816327 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9477701151 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219244138809 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762312786667 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061560133368 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131329738813 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383967769412 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.