Individuals respond differently to every situation. Thus, pupils sometimes give positive results receiving reinforcement, whereas for others, punishment is the best tool to learn.
To large extent, I concur with the given notion and the reasons will be explicited below.
To commence, the first and foremost reason behind this tendency is lust for learning somthing. Schools and parents award them in returns of their outstanding performance in academics as well as co-curricular activities. Consequently,they work more enthusiasticly and with positive energy, which results in success in every field. Additionally,certain children do not work appropriately, when they are scolded and forced to learn new knowledge. Oppositly, giving punishment might result in negative consequences likeas stubborness and behavioural problems. As physical punishment is completely banned in these days.
Probing further, young children are very sensitive towards the things, specially the way they are treated. So, they should be treated very politely so that would not face any kind of trauma, which might become hindrance in their acaddmic progress and physical growth as well. A recent survey inferred that the schoolchildren who were given positive feedback, were able to secure higher grades in examination than those who were punitive.
On the flip side, in few cases, it becomes mandatory to panalize children, when they are not bringing deasirable results inspite of having all the ammenities available.They use to make lame excuses for not executing their school work or other activities. Therefore, in such conditions, parents should give small punishments like limited time for watching television and restricting favourite activities. Moreover, by doing so they can realise their mistakes and do not tend to repeat.
Conclusively, retributing disciples and allocating awards has both efficacious and precarious sides and depends upon the situation and type of student what suits the best.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , they
...s co-curricular activities. Consequently,they work more enthusiasticly and with posit...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 343, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , certain
... in success in every field. Additionally,certain children do not work appropriately, whe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 557, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s stubborness and behavioural problems. As physical punishment is completely banne...
^^
Line 8, column 169, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
... of having all the ammenities available.They use to make lame excuses for not execut...
^^^^
Line 8, column 174, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...aving all the ammenities available.They use to make lame excuses for not executing ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, as for, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15340089117 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685810810811 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4503611958 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148709753148 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413427430014 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332997494941 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656555823283 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340769730419 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.