Individuals respond differently to every situation. Thus, pupils sometimes give positive results receiving reinforcement, whereas for others, punishment is the best tool to learn.To large extent, I concur with the given notion and the reasons will be explicited below.
One the one hand, in few cases, it becomes mandatory to panalize children, when they are not bringing deasirable results inspite of having all the ammenities available.They use to make lame excuses for not executing their school work or other activities. Therefore, in this situations, parents should give small punishments like limited time for watching television and restricting favourite activities. Moreover, by doing so they can realise their mistakes and do not tend to repeat.
On the other hand,the first and foremost reason behind consolaion is lust for learning somthing. Schools and parents award them in returns of their outstanding performance in academics as well as co-curricular activities. Consequently,they work more enthusiasticly and with positive energy, which results in success in every field. Additionally,certain children do not work appropriately, when they are scolded and forced to learn new knowledge. Oppositly, giving punishment might result in negative consequences likeas stubborness and behavioural problems. As corporal punishment is completely banned in these days.
Probing further, young children are very sensitive towards the things, specially the way they are treated. So, they should be treated very politely so that would not face any kind of trauma and distressed situation, which might become hindrance in their acaddmic progress and physical growth as well. A recent survey inferred that the schoolchildren who were given positive feedback, were able to secure higher grades in examination than those who were punitive.
Conclusively, reitdisciples and allocating awards has both efficacious and precarious sides and depends upon the situation and type of student what suits the best.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...s, punishment is the best tool to learn.To large extent, I concur with the given n...
^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
... of having all the ammenities available.They use to make lame excuses for not execut...
^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...aving all the ammenities available.They use to make lame excuses for not executing ...
^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...work or other activities. Therefore, in this situations, parents should give small p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...not tend to repeat. On the other hand,the first and foremost reason behind consol...
^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , they
...s co-curricular activities. Consequently,they work more enthusiasticly and with posit...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , certain
... in success in every field. Additionally,certain children do not work appropriately, whe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s stubborness and behavioural problems. As corporal punishment is completely banne...
^^
Line 9, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...punitive. Conclusively, reitdisciples and allocating awards has both efficacio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, as for, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78114478114 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17551082394 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686868686869 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3105977388 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.466666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147127713739 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427003515986 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341343226718 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748495427819 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296259687705 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.