Successful sports professionals can earn great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while other think it is unfair.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Super star player, who is talented by nature in her or his sport, is earning a huge wage from his or her club. Some people advocates that these high salaries are justified while the opponents reject this notion, believing that it is unfair comparable to other important professions. I am full supportive with the justifications provided. This essay will discuss, firstly, the justifications provided for high wages of the sports professionals, and secondly, the other important professions which are more important, followed by a reasoned conclusion.
Wages level are decided based on various reasons, but the main reasons are the market needs and nation interest. Recently, sports become very popular among many people, and star players have a huge influence on their fans and spectators. Therefore, Super star players get good contracts with well-known sponsors to promote their products to their fans, and that boost the player wages more that any other profession. For example, Football player such as Mohamed Salah, who plays with Liverpool club, is currently getting the higher salary and bonus from several brands in England due to his spectacular performance in last English League.
Other professions may be having a significant importance than sports professionals; however, the wages provided for these are low in principal. In fact, it is unfair to provide those people such wages due to its critical and pivotal role in the country. Politicians are responsible for the future of the country by their decisions, and it is mandatory to compensate them reasonably. For instance, the president of United States of America earns much lower than any superstar in the football game.
In conclusion, there are no doubts of the importance of politician’s role, but the wages are decided based on the market which is controlled by people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: IN_PRINCIPAL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in principle' (=as a rule)?
Suggestion: in principle
...r, the wages provided for these are low in principal. In fact, it is unfair to provide those...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29830508475 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91194924996 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3549427544 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.230769231 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190656719049 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665658679477 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849870098513 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111079175602 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891608096897 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.