Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. Given time, technology
will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree with this
statement?
Nowadays, usage of technology has become increasingly popular. Some experts are of the notion that digitalization will eventually take over the tradition of mentorship in school. In this essay, I will depict why I disagree with this view due to the essence of human feedback and practice of disciplinary in the classroom.
Firstly, importance of human feedback is irrefutable to teach a lesson. To be precise, a student may learn the topic primarily from online study materials and assessment tools. However, to reach the advanced level for most of the subject, they will require evaluation and advice from a teacher. this is the only way forward for the pupil to not make the same mistakes. Moreover, every individual comes with unique question related to the course material. Therefore, a pre-built lecture or digital support system can never be enough, and the necessity of having teacher in student's academic development will stay unavoidable despite of any technological revolution.
Secoundly, teacher is needed to ensure discipline the school compound. Only presence of a teacher can assure that children will learn and follow the rules and regulations. For instance, imagine a robot is taking a class for students aged 10 to 12. will it be appropriate method considering the fact that the earlier age are the time one can easily break disciplinary rules if he is not monitored closely? Needless to mention that, academic institutions are known to be the primary place to grow soft skills and moral values which type of education can not be offered through digital advancement.
To conclude, due to the inevitable impact of a teacher in student's academic learning process and soft skill development, technology will never be able to replace the practice of human mentorship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e evaluation and advice from a teacher. this is the only way forward for the pupil t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Will
...ing a class for students aged 10 to 12. will it be appropriate method considering th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be offered through digital advancement. To conclude, due to the inevitable impac...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22569444444 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92140611954 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9955553498 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109885807737 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381726110087 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455985286097 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755284957157 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352831761754 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.