Is technology time-consuming or time-saving.Give your opinion and support it with examples.
The use technology has widely increased in current modern world. It has numerously changed the entire world. Many companies have built World class modern equipment’s which makes the work of people straightforward. However, this doesn’t mean that all kind of recent advancement are time saving. Especially, due the rapid growth of social media lot of people is spending more time in the unwanted things. In this essay
To begin with, vast development of technology has made lot of things uncomplicated. Specifically, household equipment’s created a drastic change in the life of more people. It has reduced lot of time in many areas particularly in cooking, washing and cleaning. Also, it has become the state-of-the-art in communication. Clearly, we can interact with anyone from other part of the world irrespective of the geographical location. This has helped lot of people personally and officially. For instance, People staying in abroad can contact their family at any time quickly and it’s true that unemployed educated person with a mobile phone and internet connection can get more access to the job sectors easily and quickly.
Although, technologies have helped our accessibility easier in many areas, there are also certain places where people are wasting time unnecessarily. Specifically, in the latest social media’s like Internet, what’s up, you tube etc. Even though, these are useful for lot of things, people are fascinated towards more inappropriate things which are detrimental. Once they have become addicted to these hobbies then it’s tough to come out that situation and obviously it will end up in wasting more time.
To Sum up, utilizing the technology depends on the behavior of each person. The one who chooses it for correct purpose can certainly, save more time. But if someone really want to use it unnecessarily and waste their time then nobody can stop them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me in the unwanted things. In this essay To begin with, vast development of techn...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
..., save more time. But if someone really want to use it unnecessarily and waste their...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, then, for instance, kind of, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37171052632 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10070019067 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5271625762 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9473684211 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186535368636 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567634038282 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494398173971 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122536858861 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019427826987 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.