Television dominates the free-time of too many people. It can make people lazy and prevent them from socialising with others.
Do you agree or disagree?
Television becomes monarch of leisure time for many people. It also makes people reckless and curbs making new friends. As a result, less body movement makes people getting body obesity and leads to various health issue. I agree television has become a ruler of free-time for many people and gives a high impact in lifestyle. Nonetheless, it benefit for some people.
School teenagers are the main victim for this issue. Undoubtedly, they tend to watch many sitcoms at free-time between courses. Consequently, they fail to go out to join a club to socialise with others. In other words, series of Television programmes such as Big Bang theory, Friends, attracts them a lot leaving them bewildered who will get eliminated in the next round of competition in that programme. Rather participating in a sports club to develop a team work or making new friends than leveraging time in watching series of dramas. Therefore, it develops an eagerness amongst some people to utilize available time on watching their desired programmes. Due to the fact, less body movement and sitting in a place for long time gives not only body obesity but also increase in eyes power.
On a positive note, there are some Television addicts watching healthy programmes on their free-time such as healthy diet, Keep-fit programme. Thus, they utilize tips for free from programme in their daily life to stay healthy and fit.
In a summary, television is invented to relax people at their free-time instead of letting it to dominate. I agree that Television programme, develops a laziness in people lifestyle to socialize with others. However, it benefit for some people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'benefits'?
Suggestion: benefits
...gh impact in lifestyle. Nonetheless, it benefit for some people. School teenagers ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...round of competition in that programme. Rather participating in a sports club to devel...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'benefits'?
Suggestion: benefits
...e to socialize with others. However, it benefit for some people.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10701107011 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71674440348 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571955719557 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2982233588 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4117647059 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9411764706 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302529162334 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973216983202 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771216730043 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19508008123 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731171785061 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.