Television dominates the free-time of too many people. It can make people lazy and prevent them from socialising with others. Do you agree or disagree?
Television is one of the sources of entertainment to majority of the population across the globe. few argue that some people spend their majority of leisure time to their couches and viewing channels thus making them lazy and also hamper their social skills, I disagree to this statement. This essay will discuss how content on TV enable people to socialize in a better way along with being informative and healthy whilst viewing it.
There is ample evidence that there has been a paradigm shift of general fitness and knowledge of an average audience. The central reason for this is introduction of activity shows such as fitness and art creation programs. It enables the audience to simultaneously work with instructors thus keeping them engaged informative and healthy at the same time without stepping out of their homes. To illustrate this, an Oxford University survey suggests that the subscriptions to trainer led channels have increased from 10% to 70 % exemplifying the growing demand among the viewers. Therefore it is conclusively clear that television indirectly aids in improving mental and physical health of people.
The primary topics of discussion in any social gatherings will be the content that’s aired. It is not an understatement when said that the matches broadcasted on television are source of making or breaking a relationships. The primetime news debates also helps individuals develop an educated perspective of the events happening and also act on it. To exemplify this, an incident reported on a Israeli news channel stirred a revolution against the current government policies and also succeeded in reforming them. Thus it is possible to state that it plays a key role in keeping the audience abreast of happening events and consequently be active part of the society.
To sum up, although spending time watching television is frowned upon by many, in my opinion it acts as a medium of communication to the masses and also brings together people of similar interests along with maintaining their fitness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Few
...ity of the population across the globe. few argue that some people spend their majo...
^^^
Line 2, column 578, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...g the growing demand among the viewers. Therefore it is conclusively clear that televisio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a relationship' or simply 'relationships'?
Suggestion: a relationship; relationships
...vision are source of making or breaking a relationships. The primetime news debates also helps ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...exemplify this, an incident reported on a Israeli news channel stirred a revoluti...
^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s and also succeeded in reforming them. Thus it is possible to state that it plays a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, therefore, thus, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22492401216 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92628284913 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607902735562 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1090182199 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.785714286 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150860342234 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437076406914 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467878068017 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947313233033 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503870347584 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.