There is an increasing amount of advertising directed at children which encourages them to buy goods such as toys and snacks Many parents are worried that these advertisements put too much pressure on children while some advertisers claim that they provid

Essay topics:

There is an increasing amount of advertising directed at children, which encourages them to buy goods such as toys and snacks.Many parents are worried that these advertisements put too much pressure on children while some advertisers claim that they provide useful information to children.
Discuss both the views and give your opinion.

Adverts have become ubiquitous around the world. It is often seen that there is a contentious argument between the parents and advertisement producers with regards to its impact on kids. A few parents are of a notion that this ads will have an adverse impact on their child whilst other assume it can enhance their knowledge about the product. This essay will elicit both the points along with my opinion on the same.

To commence, many children nowadays are glued to television which is a major source of advertising. This attracts their attention towards many products which are unnecessary and can even have a detrimental effect on their health. Some parents have a perception that because of fancy adverts and colorful wrapping kids are intended to buy them irrespective of their parents will. Consequently, this will put a burden on the parents shoulder to afford it and also impact a child's health. To illustrate, there are a few products in market which contain high amount of fats and sugar which leads to adipose and even diabetes at an early age. However, this ads make kids reluctant to follow their parent’s advice and in insist on their demands.

On the other hand, there are producers of this ads who think that advertisements tends to depict more knowledge about the products. In addition, they also say that parents should be prudent as adverts contains all the details of the product in details. For Example, if a Coke add shows a man jumping off the cliff for some adventure there is always a statutory warning that it should not be tried by children. Hence, advertisement leads to product details rather than the misleading concept and it is up to people on how they adapt the things.

To conclude, Advertisement makers are right on their part because they are selling products only and it is not their concern to look at the consequences. However, in my opinion, I strongly believe that this ads should be played a limited number of times and parents should also be cautious of the content that their kids are watching. Hence, government can make some stern rules to reduce the frequency of such ads.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (5 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ids. A few parents are of a notion that this ads will have an adverse impact on thei...
^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...even diabetes at an early age. However, this ads make kids reluctant to follow their...
^^^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... the other hand, there are producers of this ads who think that advertisements tends...
^^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... in my opinion, I strongly believe that this ads should be played a limited number o...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, look, so, for example, in addition, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85479452055 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63001712056 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520547945205 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6554905108 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.235294118 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4705882353 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184275180679 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591620552119 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374405935892 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110128584806 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315719113736 0.056905535591 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.