These days many families move abroad for work. Some people believe that this benefits the children in these families. Others believe that it makes their lives more difficult.
Since a couple of centuries, people who are having privileges to choose their destination of living always had substantiated viewpoint on the pros and cons of relocating to abroad. I adhere that the family relocating to abroad will have more benefits. Whereas some argue that moving to a new place will make their life difficult. This contentious topic has been profoundly debated in several forums. I shall scrutinize both points of view by providing some relevant example.
When it comes to relocating to abroad, I propose that children's education, quality of life and financial factors count a lot because at the end of the day these factors become pertinent. Education which is very crucial shall be done at the right Universities is perennial for us. In addition, I emphasize that quality of life in abroad is far better because of the government's pragmatic view on immigrants. To illustrate, the search suggested by Times Magazine that quality of education becomes the foundation stone for most successful people in the world.
Paradoxically, some reckon that relocating to abroad will jeopardize the future of families because of some people who can not get adapt to the different culture and stand by the law. People who are not ready to digest the laws of the land usually end up in trouble. In addition, I suppose the most pertinent reason for problems have created due to the pupil's tendency to the drug or alcohol and bullying at school. For instance, people who are not ready to cut whatever corners needed to avoid issues in a foreign land, may not survive long way.
To summarize, I propound moving to abroad could be seen as life-enhancing and garners with abundance opportunities in both education and career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ting to abroad will have more benefits. Whereas some argue that moving to a new place w...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 354, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pupils'' or 'pupil's'?
Suggestion: pupils'; pupil's
...on for problems have created due to the pupils tendency to the drug or alcohol and bul...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, whereas, for instance, i suppose, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0276816609 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82086515186 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584775086505 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6712635704 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.785714286 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227439622275 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684620669483 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453367755501 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116878683387 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541675845563 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.