Throughout the history male leaders always lead us to violence and conflict If a society is governed by female leaders it will be more peaceful To what extent do you agree or disagree

The gender of leaders, especially in case of male politicians in power is considered as a cause of negative outcomes such as aggression, constant tension between countries and abuse of power. Some believe, if females had been in leadership roles in the history, a society would have been more peaceful. However, in my opinion, I strongly disagree with this mentioned statement.

Firstly, I acknowledge there are unchangeable facts that male leaders have initiated many fierce wars resulted in painful consequences from ancient to current. For example, World War I and World War II are one of the world tragedies that occurred under male leaderships. However, those historical wars were not a decision of a solo male leader’s interest but also pressure from other politicians, groups, economy and other consequences involved. It is no doubt wars are based on the worldwide plot behind.

Secondly, feminine leaderships can fail to reinforce the world peace. Based on the history, females also could make aggressive choices same as men do. In 1200s, the first and only Japanese female emperor known as Himiko took advantage of her power and sentenced capital punishment for citizen who contested her politics. According to the traditional documentation, it is said the number of people who were eliminated during the period was up to nine thousands and it included many youngsters as well.

In conclude, although male politicians tend to use power to solve issues, it is undoubtedly thoughtless to assert they bring chaos to the world as there were the history that peace was destroyed under female readership.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was destroyed under female readership.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, no doubt, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25096525097 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89597939912 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644787644788 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.928345168 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130725920471 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407015032736 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331420147087 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719875949249 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194386023233 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.