Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as friends, help at work and at home. Is this a positive or negative development?
The modern world is significantly changed in comparison with the past, especially cutting-edge technologies such as robotics has made an enormous step ahead. In my opinion, it is inevitable change; however, it has advantages as well as disadvantages for humankind. In this essay, I will consider both sides of this development.
From one side, robots can be significantly helpful in doing time-consuming and physically demanding jobs including industrial tasks in a dangerous environment and household choirs. It is understood that robots are more efficient, work longer hours without any rest and produce higher quality products. As a result, people have an opportunity to save some time for themselves and use it for other more enjoyable tasks, such as inventing something new at their work or spending quality time with children and spouses at home.
However, using social robots can be risky, especially if children are interacting with them. First, these kinds of robots are addictive and give an illusion of companionship without having a real relationship. Thus, interacting with these empathy machines may get in the way of children’s ability to develop a capacity for empathy themselves. In addition, having a robot instead of real friends may increase a person’s feelings of loneliness and isolation as humans need to communicate and bond with humans.
In conclusion, I believe that the development of robotics is our future. However, having considered the consequences of this trend I consider that these technologies are useful in terms of help in a house and working environment. Meanwhile, usage of them as friends can be harmful to a child’s development intensify a person’s feelings of abandonment and loneliness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this empathy' or 'these empathies'?
Suggestion: this empathy; these empathies
...al relationship. Thus, interacting with these empathy machines may get in the way of children...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elings of abandonment and loneliness.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4375 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21873897687 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8083661568 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.769230769 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241228408585 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778747272047 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046452416963 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138035500583 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654230111274 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.