Today’s schools should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
In the 21st Century, where technology is changing rapidly but still schools are on the same modal for a decade. Mandatory subjects are still old that don’t have real-life benefits in the student’s future. In the given context, there is a strong requirement of changing the ongoing system and should be added financially as well in the module, and I am strongly agreed on this point.
First and foremost, financial freedom is the first goal of everyone's life and everyone needs that in their life to support themselves and family as well. If schools will teach this than in the case of unemployment also normal person knows how they can survive. For example, everyone is earning, but most people don’t know how to plan for the future and what can be achieved if there is an education of financial survival during the early days in life.
Another point of consideration is that everyone works in life for the betterment of the future and plan for their wellbeing during the financial crisis, this could be achieved if a person already aware of the complexity of future requirements for survival. For instance, the Government is providing pension to their employee as a part of this and the same motive that normal person never thought if living an ordinary life but if that was taught during early life than he should overcome from this point of the situation. Therefore, it is clear that schools should teach finance freedom to their students.
To sum up, in spite of the fact that general education is the base on society but adding finance in school education will boost and provide a better future life as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... support themselves and family as well. If schools will teach this than in the cas...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.875 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59090835856 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510714285714 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.2166090045 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180831786529 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783813459563 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338627497724 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104468401316 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510848695158 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.