Any new technological development in the recent years is a boosting or drag for the society in general. Do you agree or disagree that Mass Media, Like TV, Radio and Newspaper have a huge impact on people, especially young generation? What is your opinion? Provide reason and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
The issue sparked a heated debate about whether new technology is blessing for young generations or have a big impact on people. The point of contention calls for its analysis by various perspective. However, it is apparent that there are many benefits that is impossible to get without mass media or new technology. I am inclined to believe that that TV, Radio and newspaper can be a plus, and I will discuss controversial aspects and example of that throughout this essay.
There are myriad of explanations for this. The most conspicuous is that new technology development and mass media improve awareness and knowledge. Furthermore, a critical element of this is that it can give more easy life to everyone. To cite an example on this matter, a study conducted by a university of western Australia shows that mass media can change future of any country with positive awareness.
On the other hand, some people adopt an opposite view and tend to believe that it can be led on negative direction if not used with proper manner as mass media can spread any negative news as well with the same speed as positive. Similarly, it is crucial to note that due to media affect young generation can be diverted towards negativity. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by prestigious oxford university that shows change of results due to mass media intervention.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of mass media far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09818181818 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92474424961 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592727272727 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.129352475 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.846153846 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211337640789 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733724672779 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058881398464 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121411809881 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643255220102 0.0609392437508 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.