In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. cashless society seems to be a reality, and how realistic do you think it is? what are the advantage and disadvantage of this phenomenon?
The issue sparked a heated debate about using credit cards that are increasing cashless transaction are realistic or myth. The point of contention calls for its analysis by various perspective. However, it is apparent that there are many benefits of cashless society by using a credit card that we cannot get with cash transaction. I am inclined to believe that the cashless society can be a plus, and I will discuss controversial aspects and examples of that throughout this essay.
There are myriad of explanation for this. The most conspicuous is that credit cards are not only giving us the opportunity of the cashless transaction but also the security of funds and we do not need to carry cash to pay during shopping. Furthermore, a critical element of this is that if we are using with an extraordinary mindset that there are many rewards points that we can encase or can use to travel or for gift purchasing for our beloved. To cite an example on this matter, I traveled from India to Singapore by my credit card points that I earned during two-year transactions.
On the other hand, some people adopt an opposite view and tend to believe that when we are doing credit card shopping than we do in access and unable to pay bill on time that lead to extra burden. As a tangible example, some scientific research was undertaken by a prestigious university on human being by doing cashless transaction and observed that they spend more than their capacity.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of cashless society far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 5.94088669951 252% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 20.9802955665 181% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93939393939 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84606403488 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558922558923 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9648399932 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270659005632 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961449088094 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483444843559 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162336755753 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447122909077 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.