Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and the government should encourage businesses to move from cities to rural areas. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There is no denying the fact, housing and traffic congestion issues are becoming bane to citizens living in large urban areas, there is an argument that the government ought to persuade companies to relocate to the countryside. Apparently, the advantages of this far outweigh the downsides owing to housing and business overheads are more affordable and there is less traffic problems.
To commence with the drawbacks, there are some to relocating businesses and companies to rural areas. One of these is that many employees have settled with their families and own their own homes. Moving to a rural area would uproot them and their families, in addition, they may not be suited to life in the country so this could cause stress and motivation issues. To illustrate this, The Tribune newspaper carried out a survey in 2014 of employees who were transferred to new offices in small towns and rural locations. 58% of them said they were unhappy with the move and had trouble settling down.
Despite these downsides, I believe that the advantages of moving out of big cities far outweigh the disadvantages. One of these is that housing is larger and much more affordable. For instance, a small apartment in Sydney costs three times that of a large apartment in Mount Gambier which is in a very rural location in Australia. Company overheads are also far more cost-effective outside of cities. An office space 15 miles out of Sydney tends to be much bigger and overall rental costs are considerably lower than that of Sydney. Another obvious benefit is that traffic congestion is no longer an issue in rural areas or villages.
In conclusion, even though there may be downsides to companies moving out of cities, I think that relocating to the countryside carries more advantages because of cost-effective housing and business rents are much lower.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less traffic'?
Suggestion: less traffic
...heads are more affordable and there are fewer traffic problems. To commence with the drawb...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, if, may, so, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03571428571 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74983516579 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9516603062 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.785714286 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173738299573 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602586692661 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553485246527 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106025515296 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295471523978 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.