The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should e banned like smoking .To what extent do you agree or disgree.
Mobile phones are now an intrinsic part of our daily lives, that is a truth which cannot be contested with. They have also dramatically changed the way the entire world now communicates. Everything is now available with utmost ease at the tip of your fingers, from your next workout schedule, to your next date and your next meal.
The first thought would naturally be that why would you want to ban the use of such a fantastic device. But as everything else, even mobile phones come with a fair share of drawbacks. A simple look on a busy downtown street can prove that. When you watch everyone walking busy on their phones with their heads tilted down, you cannot help but think of it like a directionless herd.
Dozens of reports are now pouring in which are proving that humans are now more antisocial than ever and more addicted to their phones than anything else. Checking the phone every minute seems like an activity many can’t live without. What was once supposed to assist us in living a better life, is now ruling us, without us being aware of it.
I wholeheartedly agree that there should be a curb on the usage of mobile phones in certain areas. A simple ban like this will only make people more aware of what they are missing out in life, like the fragrance of the newly bloomed flower or a baby laugh, which they would otherwise miss out on because they were too busy on their phones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ving that humans are now more antisocial than ever and more addicted to their pho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56299212598 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28439093346 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61811023622 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1227710938 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5833333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 7.06120827912 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195013445971 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734474082069 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659162870298 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113728735952 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539325593967 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.4159519038 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.