Using cell phones and computers made communication among people much easier As a result letter writing could be lost in the future To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement

Certainly the communication with cellphones and computers are much easier and faster in comparison with letters. So its obvious that the letters would be delivered to certain specific areas only such as government orders and few romantic expressions.

One may say letter writing as a skill can not lost in future, Not only it is a documented proof of one's communication. It is also powerful toll and method to express your ideas clearly, if written accordingly. The use of letter is visible in day to day life from writing a letter to your boss about your increment to opening an account in a bank or any complaint one wants to register in a court. Through the usage of computer and phone is changing quite rapidly. With the smart phones things are becoming easier. Apps are replacing and reducing difficult procedure of paper work. I still remember when somebody has to open an account in bank, a letter to the manager was must but now one can open an account using a mobile app. Even to lodge F.I.R there is a mobile app.

With the introduction of A.I i.e Artificial Intelligence things bare becoming very different and difficult to fathom what an AI can do. What only it can change your speech to text, it can suggest you to write better even it can write letter for you. Technology is changing and so is the interface, the common use of letters or can say the larger population ought not use letter widely with introduction of cellphones and computers.

But there will be domain and group of the people who will love writing letters in any format and they will bound of do so may be become the work age or their style.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
...y say letter writing as a skill can not lost in future, Not only it is a documented ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... letter writing as a skill can not lost in future, Not only it is a documented proof of o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e, Not only it is a documented proof of ones communication. It is also powerful toll...
^^^^
Line 3, column 748, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: R
...t using a mobile app. Even to lodge F.I.R there is a mobile app. With the intr...
^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...bile app. With the introduction of A.I i.e Artificial Intelligence things bar...
^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: I
...bile app. With the introduction of A.I i.e Artificial Intelligence things bare b...
^^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile app. With the introduction of A.I i.e Artificial Intelligence things bare ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, may, so, still, as to, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60824742268 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59091944497 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563573883162 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4189679876 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253091910481 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824948298429 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595791986369 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147359116057 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230634433167 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.