Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on your children.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Desktop and Laptop have become integral part of children's liefstyle in this pandemic. There is common notion that the daily use of computer can cause more detrimental effects on children than the benefits. I agreee with that statement. After a long time exposure to these gadgets, there is an increase in health issues and decrease in socialzing skills among the children.
Undoubtedly, Computer knowledge is a must to suceed in any stream in this competitive world. At the same time, we have to ensure that our kids are not exposed to continuous use of it as it might cause hazardous health issues in the long run. For instance, retinal disorders are reported in high numbers amongst the students of age group 10 to 15 years. This is due to the fact that light rays from computer screens damage the eyes when they see it for a prolonged duration without maintaining proper distance from it. In addition to this, it leads to sedentary lifestyle among the children, limiting their physical movement, and results in obesity and other lifestyle disorders.
Socializing is an important skill that every children should learn to grow up as a responsible citizen. It can be mastered only when they interact with their friends and neighbours. But children of current generation believe that Facebook and Twitter are the networking platform to socialize. As a result, they spend too much time in such online activities and fall for virtual friends. This creates a dangerous situation where our children ends up in fake reality and will become increasingly difficult to make them aware of real time world when they grow up.
To sum up, I believe that consistent and intense use of computer can lead to unwarranted side effects among the children in the long run if it is not supervised with caution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for instance, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94059405941 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66689130838 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607260726073 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6740049235 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155967582877 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515136989197 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482341545636 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101537701481 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306914883411 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.