Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on your
children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, we can see tendency of children using computers almost every day and every time. There are positive and negative sides of this. I firmly agree that using desktops very often can influences on our children in destroyed ways.
Firstly, children where they grow up do not realise their own natural opinion or preferences. So, when teenagers become every day computer users, they can face negative effects of this. For example, spending too much hours at electronic monitors damage eyes vision. Furthermore, children become addicted of computer games very fast, which is more dangerous for them because it destroys their mind. Perhaps, children even do not know about problems which can brings overusing computers and they probably cannot be adequate in this issue; thus, parents should be very careful of time limiting using computers.
Secondly, even though our modern life sets up new rules about popularity computers everywhere it cannot be always appropriate for all ages of people. Actually, for children there should be time limits of using such electronic devises like computers. Despite the fact that computers also help develop children’s cognitive skills by using it in appropriate way, at the same time to be aware of computers in general or using it for educational purposes I think it is enough just several times per a week to use it
To conclude, from these arguments given I agree that apart from new technology devises such computers which can help in our life in certain areas children possibly can become addicted or have different health problem of overusing them obviously which has negative effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'influence'
Suggestion: influence
...gree that using desktops very often can influences on our children in destroyed ways. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ects of this. For example, spending too much hours at electronic monitors damage eye...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, apart from, for example, i think, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23106060606 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60290672 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 130.895769524 49.4020404114 265% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 125.545454545 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247681699725 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103268455416 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781230462293 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165851283162 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708892551141 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.