We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Giving help, which is always generally considered to be beneficial, has led to this question that communities and nations rather need to be helped merely than helping everybody around the globe since it seems to be a difficult task. I completely disagree with the given statement, since helping all the people seems to be more advantageous in certain ways than communities and countries.

To initiate the reasons why it is important to help everyone globally. The first and foremost benefit is the strengthening of bonding with one another throughout the world. To explain, people, across the borders, who help any needy person or community, with each other, are likely to make correlations that, forgiving and taking help, in the future, maybe beneficial for both of them because, for enhancing the relations, helping someone is always considered to be the best way. To cite an example, in India, the farmers, who are protesting against the new farm acts, are being helped not only by the local people but also the foreigners from different nations such as Canada, Australia, and the USA in terms of money, shelter, and food that have led to good relations with each other.

Another major benefit of helping someone cross the borders is to gain popularity among people throughout the world. To elaborate, a single person or the group of people, in any country, who help any individual or the community, around the globe, get the name and fame that can be a good lesson for new generation also in terms of giving aid because, to get rid of the trouble, very rare people come at first and lend a helping hand to someone. For example, Khalsa aid, which is the helping organization worldwide, helped the people in Syria during a /the terrorist attack and gained popularity because of helping people for providing food, medical kits, and shelter.

In conclusion, I completely agree with this point of view because helping people all over the world seems to have more benefits because of increasing the bond as well as popularity among people.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97674418605 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63016984277 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.1254268282 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.2 106.682146367 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.4 20.7667163134 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271639255739 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123024270502 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455853294895 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179268729167 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055550198208 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.