Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that developed countries should not only open their doors to those seeking asylum but, also assist them with basic human necessities like food and shelter. This essay completely disagrees with this statement because this will lead to overcrowding and pose a stress on the resources.
To begin with, first world countries are already struggling with over population as people, who want a better standard of living, move there on the pretext of jobs or studies. These countries are finding ways to curb the increasing number of residents and accepting refugees will only add to this existing problem. According to a recent article, Germany refused entry to millions of refugees, who were at their border, as were afraid it would lead to a huge spike in population.
Another reason is that it will put a strain on the resources. In other words, big countries are facing a huge scarcity of houses, unemployment, poverty, etc. and these concerns need to be addressed on priority. In such a scenario, it is definitely unfair to accept those, who have been displaced from their homes, if the government is unable to meet their basic requirements. For example, the USA has put a halt on the inflow of people and is now concentrating on the betterment of their citizens. However, some people desperately need to move out and countries which have the means should make an exception on humanitarian grounds.
In conclusion, wealthy nations are swarmed with people and are at a risk of draining their resources and hence should not accept refugees.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99616858238 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74479827817 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616858237548 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2501769281 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200534329407 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604875156221 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583695569654 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120852419928 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385010150438 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.