Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that developing states should be helped by rich nations with humane aid in times of natural calamities. This essay agrees with this statement because developed countries have outstanding human resources to give a hand to the underprivileged one.
To begin with, most of wealth countries count with special resources to overcome disasters. They also have a great technology system to forecast the meteorological conditions of weather, in order to prevent future incidents provoked by nature. Moreover, they have such a brilliant medical structure to respond with all needed materials in moments of pandemic and catastrophe. For that reason, the poorest always need their help. In addition, a recent study found that countries such as the United States have answered to countries like Philippines and Maldives sending supplies, medical units and rescue operations to tackle landslides and earthquakes disasters that continue affecting life conditions of the habitants.
Furthermore, developed nations have created a good image and a sense of collaboration to global level. They have showed a nice relationship to those who drastically face the lack of food and water supply, for the reason that, they do possess a higher capital and good materials for aid. For instance, neediest communities lack of these privileges due to millions are starving and they are forced to live in the absence of basic amenities. They do not own food, clothes and homes to live safe and healthy. Therefore, it is primary responsibility of each rich society to help needy people.
In conclusion, well financially countries should support pauper states with humanitarian assistance in disastrous events because they have the bare necessities and resources which benefit the needy and for anyone’s survival
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the neediest'.
Suggestion: , the neediest
...and good materials for aid. For instance, neediest communities lack of these privileges du...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44642857143 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95646774557 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621428571429 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8079589182 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.307692308 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170994344238 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561095302535 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542974572857 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111315771187 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491689436425 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.