When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
You should write at least 250 words.
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Globalisation has changed the way of living and lifestyle. One of the major factor of these changes is technological advancements. There have been different type of technological advancements, that have played vital role in this whole process. These changes have made wok easier for few and difficult for few.
Nowadays, things have changed due to technological advancements. Different methods of learning have developed over time in institutions, all over the globe. As compared to past, when white chalk and boards were used to conduct lectures. Due to technological advancement we are witnessing new gadgets being used to conduct classes, i.e. these days in universities students have started using different sorts of soft wares for presentations. While previously only Microsoft office was used. The process has evolved over time and new methods have replaced old ones.
While on the other hand, there are different traditional methods been used to get different tasks completed. It can be seen in profession of farming, mining and drilling. In farming old methods of sowing seeds are used, as there are few limitations in technologically advanced methods, same goes with mining methods.
However, it is important when country develops its technology they shouldn't forget about traditional methods. As we have seen in past technological advancements are not accepted straight away. Therefore, it is important to continue both methods in parallel initially and replace old methods with new over period of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...ncements. Different methods of learning have developed over time in institutions, al...
^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... sorts of soft wares for presentations. While previously only Microsoft office was us...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...en country develops its technology they shouldnt forget about traditional methods. As we...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uldnt forget about traditional methods. As we have seen in past technological adva...
^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...y and replace old methods with new over period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d methods with new over period of time.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48936170213 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06218632044 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604255319149 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4739664416 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.625 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6875 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.059792483315 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0218587029608 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293800683521 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0410670540788 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192604673196 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.97 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.