While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualifications and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and include relevant examples.
Employee is one of the key element behind the growth of company. During the hiring, interviewer should more focus on internal ability rather than academic achievement and experience in the field. I agree with the opinion to large extent and my inclination justified in ensuing paragraphs.
Among the various viewpoints, the strongest one is, candidate with flexible nature easily adopt the new system or technology implemented in the organisation. For instance, in the field of Information Technology salaried have to work with many kind of software in periodical time. To change with the new software, it can be uncomfortable for the employee who have fix mind-set. Moreover, person with calm personality gives importance to search the solution in critical situation rather than waiting for superior. Individual with this kind of approach adjust in the environment very fast and improve the team-work.
Furthermore, in the time of short deadline, behaviour of the team member plays key role. Employee who have nature to agree on every situation without any objection ready to do overtime to meet the deadline of any task. In this situation management can do proper resource allocation to achieve the task. Apart from this, ability of multitasking creates positive impression of employee in the company and increase the change of higher position in short amount of time.
On contrary, it is difficult to judge the candidate in such a short time of interview. Qualification ranks clears the picture of ability of the person which was judged by institutes. So, it is good to take decision based on the degree and result. Additionally, for specific vacancy, person have to relay on the university results. For example, to hire a candidate for a temporary research topic, it is important the good knowledge on that specific area rather than nature.
All in all, for growth of the company and achieve the specific goal on time behaviour is most important of the employee. Where as in recruitment for limited area or time importance to the degree and experience hold more benefit to the organisation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun kind seems to be countable; consider using: 'many kinds'.
Suggestion: many kinds
...n Technology salaried have to work with many kind of software in periodical time. To chan...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'fixed'.
Suggestion: fixed
...uncomfortable for the employee who have fix mind-set. Moreover, person with calm pe...
^^^
Line 15, column 122, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...iour is most important of the employee. Where as in recruitment for limited area or time...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, apart from, for example, for instance, in short, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20234604106 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9077011627 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533724340176 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5592158307 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.3684210526 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9473684211 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125553724429 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368220356014 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398411311543 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708106100464 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346512505132 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.