World history suggests that violence and conflict were more evident under male leadership than under female leadership. So, for peace to prevail, female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Prejudice opinions about gender qualities are always danger. Either leaders or male or female , violence and conflict is in human nature and can never attribute this trait to particular gender. I disagree to the assertion that only women leadership has better governance than their counter part. One should look both side of the coin before coming to a conclusion.Let's have look into brief of some historical characters to know the flaws of the above argument.
Historians discuss about blood shed created by Cleopatra for her greed of power.we all know medieval wars of United Kingdom fought because of cold war between Queen Marry of scott and Elizabeth I of England. Even reckless and extravagant spending of Princess Antonitte of French lead to great revolution. Her words saying ''let them eat cake'' become famous when it was complained that peasants have no bread to eat. Her comments depicts attitude of then royal family indiscipline. However, we cannot forget acute leadership qualities possessed by some women in history at the same time. For instance reforms introduced by UK's Ex- Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Her immigration plannings and taxation changed course of country's history. Ofcourse, there were also severe criticisms that she had to face because of radical norms.
On the other hand countries lead by male rulers like Henry VIII of Britain, Hitler, Napoleon are reason for this gender based prejudice. Nevertheless, great leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King proved to be very successful in leadership qualities and also achieving welfare of their communities. Hence successful leadership is not a trait to be associated with gender but to be related to the attitude. Apart, there are many Men leaders who fought for gender equality along with female leaders.
End of the day anyone who mark their name in history will always be remembered with their behaviour and message given to future generation but not based on what's their gender was. Therefore, we should pace our journey with nature of work we do rather than our sexual orientation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...danger. Either leaders or male or female , violence and conflict is in human natur...
^^
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Lets
... the coin before coming to a conclusion.Lets have look into brief of some historical...
^^^^
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... the coin before coming to a conclusion.Lets have look into brief of some historical...
^^^^
Line 1, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o know the flaws of the above argument. Historians discuss about blood shed crea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 324, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...achieving welfare of their communities. Hence successful leadership is not a trait to...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 157, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...n to future generation but not based on whats their gender was. Therefore, we should ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2426035503 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64449629541 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671597633136 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9508825081 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183048585492 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489034970159 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053638717205 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10335258195 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466137433415 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.