The world would be a better place if women own leadership. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Leading the world needs a lot of qualities, confidence, and strong decision-making ability. Though some people hold an opinion that females are more suitable as politicians because they are capable to make the globe a better home to live in, yet, I assert that leadership has nothing to do with gender and civilians should consider the qualities of the candidate while voting.
Primarily, we are living in a democracy and all the rights cannot be given to one gender only, it will create a lot of conflicts. If mother nature never differentiates between genders then we also should not do partiality on the sex basis. Moreover, most females are emotional in nature and they take decisions emotionally which may be an issue in the future. Secondly, a leader has a lot of responsibilities and therefore it requires a lot of education and qualities. A king should be confident and must have strong decision power. Leaders should be able to protect their residents from all the problems such as health issues, wealth issues, and should be able to provide them safety and security. Then only a world can become a safe place for all and clearly, any gender can do this.
In contrast, there are some people who would disagree with my opinion because they believe that if women are good homemakers then they can make the world a better place. Such people think emotionally as they see their sisters and mothers in all the females. I really wonder why they don’t see their fathers or brothers in all men. Apparently, I would like to say that these people need to think out of the gender boxes and should choose the right candidate whether male or female.
In conclusion, while some critics praise a woman for her emotional and motherly qualities, yet, I still stick to my opinion that leading the world is not a joke and a person whether a man or a woman must possess the required qualities that are necessary to improve the system
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nly, it will create a lot of conflicts. If mother nature never differentiates betw...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75595238095 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.634310236 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1561233225 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.142857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177721796254 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055184705977 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615069033247 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944328216476 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414695259161 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.