write about the following topic:
Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Write at least 250 words
Solving growing traffic and pollution issues by escalating fuel prices drags immediate attention owing to its versatility. Some of us assert upon the idea of increasing fuel prices in order to discourage people using private vehicles for commuting. I strongly oppose this idea as it will certainly have more negative impacts rather than positive. Let's discuss all the dimension of the topic before reaching to a final verdict.
To begin with, in order to support my logic, I would like to quote an example here. For instance, by escalating fuel prices, country’s economic stability would get impacted. Incremental fuel prices are directly proportional to masses consumption and inflation situation of any country. Furthermore, this phenomenon would adversely affect masses life standard and comfort. Subsequently other consumption product prices will increase.
In order to resolve the traffic growth and pollution issues, we must focus on other possible solutions. Such as Government should play their part by running awareness campaigns over pollution backed up by monetary benefits. In addition to this, Media has a pivotal role in realization campaigns on how to reduce pollution by using clean fuel. Another appropriate solution is to standardize transport system with economical fares so that people are encouraged to use local transport instead of private vehicles for daily commuting.
To recapitulate the aforementioned argument, I would like to bring the point to home. Raising fuel prices is not a solution to the given problem, rather it would become a reason to many issues such as inflation consequently, if implemented. Pollution and traffic issues are major concerns for any country nowadays, which should be dealt with organized planning and detailed analysis. Before implementing any solution, we must consider all pros and cons and must prepare mitigation plan in order to avoid any disastrous situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... negative impacts rather than positive. Lets discuss all the dimension of the topic ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pic before reaching to a final verdict. To begin with, in order to support my lo...
^^^
Line 2, column 378, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Subsequently,
...ffect masses life standard and comfort. Subsequently other consumption product prices will i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, so, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51178451178 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95087832509 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1103627636 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2941176471 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0821542972747 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0276527260372 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328699249122 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0512843639042 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230638853264 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.