With the children’s education being paid more attention to, it has been widely debated that which aspect governments should fund to improve. While some suggest hiring more teachers to teach in a small class, others highlight the importance of preschool education before kindergarten. I reckon, however, that providing some training courses to teachers is a better approach compared to the others mentioned above.
First of all, training teachers can guarantee that every student gets high-quality education with the current resources. In my opinion, training teachers doesn’t mean to lay stress on the professional knowledge of the teachers, which is undoubtedly well grasped as long as a teacher is qualified by the department of education. Instead, I think that if teacher can be instructed to care more about their students, the children might feel more connected to the teacher. For example, teachers can talk to students if some sorts of sorrow or anger are showed off. As a result, children will learn better considering not only knowledge but also how to care for others.
With respect to the option of hiring more teacher to reduce the number of each class, while I think the intention is rather appealing, it is still not practical. In fact, it is impossible to hire more teachers all of a sudden and expect that these new teachers are as proficient as the previous ones. Even if the government is really eager to recruit more teachers, it has to be planned from long shot. For example, the government should firstly encourage more students to attend the normal university by offering more scholarship. Only in this way will the school be able to hire more qualified teachers. However, it will be costlier than just training the currently available teachers and is not recommended accordingly.
Finally, it is not even less reasonable to implement preschool education. To start with, it is a period of time that is for children to play and nothing else. Depriving the children of these happy years is exceptionally objected. It is true that kids before kindergarten have the ability to do a little bit schoolwork such as simple math, but learning these things in advance doesn’t provide with any benefits. In fact, this knowledge might make the children less focused in class when attending the primary school due to the thought that they have learned it already. Instead, children of this age should be accompanied by their parents and learn some basic living skills during games or activities, which would exert more positive effects.
Based on the discussions above, it is reasonable to draw the conclusion that it is better to fund the training of teachers because it can provide the children with more benefits than hiring more teachers or adding preschool education to the current system
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...d off. As a result, children will learn better considering not only knowledge but also...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...chool education. To start with, it is a period of time that is for children to play and nothin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...e kindergarten have the ability to do a little bit schoolwork such as simple math, but lea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, really, so, still, well, while, as to, for example, i reckon, i think, in fact, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, it is true, to start with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2358.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09287257019 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74920977689 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501079913607 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6639603945 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.285714286 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0476190476 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1904761905 5.45110844103 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.499035874304 0.236089414692 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140672454789 0.076458572812 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994565849787 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310030348324 0.150856017488 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116393812662 0.0645574589148 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.