2.When you decide to find a place to travel and want to compare two places, which way do you think help you make a better decision?
- read information online
- discussing with a friend who has been to those places
In this day and age, people are exposed to all kinds of information while choosing the destination of travelling. Reading information online, with no doubt, provides mountains of significant references. However, sometimes it is too time-consuming to sort through these information that you are not sure whether it’s believable or not. Therefore, I contend that the most efficient way to compare two places is to discuss with a friend who has been to those places.
Initially, discussing with a friend helps people to obtain authentic and first-hand information efficiently. That is, when talking with friends, people can ask straightly whatever they are eager to know. For instance, subtle things like the condition of public equipment in scenery points, which local traditional snacks should be avoid and what specific tools should be carried with while visiting historic sites. Take myself as example, last time I planned to travel in Frenghuang, a small ancient town located in the west of Hunan province, China, which is renowned for a famous novel. After searching the internet, I fell in love with the peace and beautiful town, surrounded by mountains with limpid streams passing through it. To my disappointment, my friend told me that the small town has become totally commercialized, losing the feeling of nostalgia. He said that I would feel like being deceived then because the actual scene there is far from that was depicted in the novel. Learning from my friend’s lesson, I finally gave up. Had it not been my friends’ experience, I would have been misled by the information online and wasted lots of my time and money in Fenghuang.
Admittedly, information online is such integral that it contains all those small tips mentioned above. Thus, someone may assert that people should seek help from internet without disturbing their friends. Plausible as it sounds, Nevertheless, it does not hold water. With the information blooming exponentially on internet, seldom can people distinguish the most useful and authentic one from enormous essays, blogs and travel notes. Some of them are advertisements aiming at appealing to visitors and even contradict each other, making people rather puzzled. Compared to the unreliable information online, both you and your friends will benefit from discussing together. You will enjoy a nice virtual journey through your friends’ vivid narration, which helps deepen your friendship a lot.
In conclusion, considering all the factors above, it is obvious to see my notion that discussing with a friend who has once been there performs more important role in deciding a travel destination than looking for information on the internet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-10 | Shirley Lu | 70 | view |
| 2019-01-24 | Nguyen Doan | 43 | view |
- People in daily lives would frequently do the jobs that need creativity such as the job you have never done before Under this circumstance do you prefer to work alone or work with others 97
- Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want. Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite. What's your opinion? 90
- TPO48 88
- People in daily lives would frequently do the jobs that need creativity, such as the job you have never done before. Under this circumstance, do you prefer to work alone or work with others? 83
- When you are at work or study you may confront problems requiring to think about creativity For example you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do Would you prefer to work alone or work with others Use specific reasons 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...t is too time-consuming to sort through these information that you are not sure whether it's...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'avoided'?
Suggestion: avoided
...hich local traditional snacks should be avoid and what specific tools should be carri...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2284.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33644859813 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93595568657 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609813084112 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7880395266 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.761904762 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.380952381 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299929285628 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782714618049 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797053280159 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185204926978 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645146875999 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.