In 20 years there will be less pollution in the air than there is today.
The topic presented the controversial issue of air pollution. Air pollution is related to the degradation of air quality. It is degraded in several ways such as green house gases such as sulfer dioxide, carbon monooxide, cholroflorocarbon, etc and dust particules. The situation of air pollution is getting bad day by day. In my view, I do not agree with the prompt that the air pollution would be less in 20 years from now. There are several reasons on the basis of which it could be considerably supported my views.
First of all, air pollution is directly as well as indirectly related to the popullation of the world. The number of people are increasing year by year. Medical technological advancements has decreased the fatality rates. Moreover, the desire and quality of human life are improving. People, who earlier use cycles are using cars, motorbikes. Because of augmentation in population, the consumption of energy resources such as coal, petrol, diesel, etc. are reaching new heights. Each of these resources contributes in the air pollutions.
Secondly, there is race among countries to go ahead in energy sector. Every country wants to develop more and more products, wants to export more, and have desire to become manufacturing hub of the world. As a result, these countries are heavily exploiting energy resources such as coal and petroleum. Whether it is China, India or USA, they all want to supply energy to their factories. The best source of energy to factories is coal. Being cheaper, readily available in several countries and easy to handle, Coal is the largest source of fuel for several industries. Similarly, it is also the prime factors towards air pollutions. The gases releases from coal combustions and coal combustion residues, fly ash, increase the pollutants particles in air.
Admittedly, several steps are taken by different governments to prevent air pollution such Paris Accord, which suggests participating nations to control their effluents, carbon release and use renewable resources. With the invent of electric cars and bikes, people are switching their preferences towards renewable energy resources. However, in case of developing nations such as India, Pakistan, China and many more, implementation of renewable energy infrastructure and resources takes time. India is installing several new solar panels across the country, collaborating to Tesla company to build electric cars in India, and exploraing options to utilize wind and renewable energy resources.
In sum, the situation of air pollution is getting improved near furture. Delhi, Bijing, and several metro cities of the world are facing drastic poor air year by year. Countries are required to support each others in terms of renewable energy technology transfer. Poorer countries should be given financial support from IMF so that they are invest their resources in non-conventional energy resources. People should be encouraged to plant more trees and prevent cutting of forests. Alternative methods of room conditioning should be invented, leading to reduction in CFC gases. By taking such steps, in the next 50-60 years, it can be expected that air pollution would be less as compare to today.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 644, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'release'.
Suggestion: release
...ctors towards air pollutions. The gases releases from coal combustions and coal combusti...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...lease and use renewable resources. With the invent of electric cars and bikes, people are ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 342, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'invested'.
Suggestion: invested
...ncial support from IMF so that they are invest their resources in non-conventional ene...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 678, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...pected that air pollution would be less as compare to today.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, well, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2710.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 509.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32416502947 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93725581408 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540275049116 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 841.5 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0273643857 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1212121212 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4242424242 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268344178976 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670267777928 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893350876669 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159629370412 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111799562082 0.0645574589148 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 86.8835125448 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.