Methods of communication have attracted much social concern. Some sociologists believe face-to-face interaction between people is better than other types of communication. Personally, I bear in mind a strong agreement.
On the one hand, what has been put under consideration is personal enjoyment. The fact is that face-to-face communication creates chances for people to utilize many varied ways to deliver information such as body gestures or tone of voice. Therefore, it is possible for them to express the meaning of their thought more clearly and enhance the efficiency of communication. As a result, people are supposed to gain successes in socializing with others, thus feel satisfied about their abilities. Consequently, it plays a crucial role in proving that face-to-face interaction greatly fills people with happiness. More importantly, it cannot be denied that face-to-face communication possesses a large probability for people to convey their thought and receive responses immediately. It leads to the fact that there is a likelihood for them to both interact with others thoroughly and save a lot of time which is bound to be spent on other purposes. On that ground, needless to say, it is able for people to obtain more opportunities for recreational activities to satisfy their natural desires and refresh themselves after the hard-working time. As a consequence, they are certain to be provided with more and more satisfactory feelings. By and large, it is highly likely that face-to-face communication is a better choice in comparing with any other methods.
On the other hand, some people might say that there are many problems with face-to-face interaction such as the barrier of distance. Accordingly, it sets an extreme inconvenience for people. However, it is just applicable to a minority. It is widely known that with the development of technology, people nowadays have many modern devices supporting face-to-face interaction such as computers or smartphones. It follows that they can easily follow their ways of communication and put everything under control. Furthermore, face-to-face interaction stands a golden chance for people to talk with others in a more realistic and sincerer condition. Correspondingly, it is apparent that they tend to avoid the misunderstanding in association, which often causes serious conflicts, and effectively strengthen their relationship. For this reason, it is expected to helps people enlarge their social relations, leading to bringing them more useful supports when they get in trouble. This, in turn, forms a significant contribution to the success of people's careers. Subsequently, it is more easy for them to be filled with pleasing feelings. Beyond any doubt, the idea that face-to-face communication extremely frustrates people is often possible to end in collapse.
In a word, all factors mentioned above are evidence supporting my agreement. It highly recommended that people should take my writing into careful consideration to make an appropriate decision on choosing interacting methods in life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 859, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'help'.
Suggestion: help
...hip. For this reason, it is expected to helps people enlarge their social relations, ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1072, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uccess of peoples careers. Subsequently, it is more easy for them to be filled wi...
^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to interact'.
Suggestion: to interact
...ake an appropriate decision on choosing interacting methods in life.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, such as, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2613.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54777070064 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32831786252 2.67179642975 125% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535031847134 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 827.1 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6996009016 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1153846154 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244153491827 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743193625462 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795913086862 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156016206512 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811769700977 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.