Personal abilities have attracted much social concern. A minority of sociologists believe that good communication skills is the most important characteristics of a leader or a politician. Personally, I bear in mind a strong agreement with this belief.
On the one hand, what has been put under consideration is career success. The fact is that having a good communication skill creates chances for a leader to be literally confident and attain more opportunities to confront with varied circumstances. Therefore, it is possible for him to obtain a more thorough reflection of himself and be more aware of his strengths and weaknesses. As a result, he has a tendency to gradually fill the gaps in his capabilities and grow into a more competent person. Consequently, this plays a crucial role in helping the leader to have more appreciation from his colleagues and gain a lot of success in his career. More importantly, it cannot be denied that being proficient in communicating possesses a large probability for a politician to interact better with other people. It leads to the fact that there is a likelihood for him to be exposed to many different perspectives and learn a lot of valuable experiences or personal skills from others. On that ground, needless to say, he tends to have his horizon widen and gradually sharpen his existed abilities. Subsequently, it is easier for him to become more outstanding in his profession and be successful in his career. By and large, having a communication skill greatly promotes the development of the careers of leaders or politicians.
On the other hand, some people might say that to become a good leader or brilliant politician requires the combination of many other skills such as critical thinking or time management. Accordingly, communication skill is not the most crucial. However, it is just applicable to a minority. It is widely known that through communication skills, people can learn other abilities easily. Therefore, it is reasonable to say that communication skills owns the most important part. Furthermore, being good at communicating stands a chance for leaders or politicians to have more socialization with many different people. In this case, they are inclined to have more friends and gradually enlarge their social relationships. Correspondingly, it is apparent that they are bound to receive a lot of support from others in any matter. As a consequence, they are certain to gain a lot of success in their careers. Beyond any doubt, the idea that communication skill is not the most characteristic of a leader or politician is often possible to end in collapse.
In a word, all factors mentioned above are evidence supporting my agreement. It is highly recommended that everyone should take my writing into careful consideration to have a good preparation for developing personal abitilies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 884, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...s a likelihood for him to be exposed to many different perspectives and learn a lot of valuabl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 593, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ticians to have more socialization with many different people. In this case, they are inclined...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, such as, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2405.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18318965517 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29887490166 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484913793103 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 766.8 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4010355194 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.56 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22318177654 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706293974287 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847121261992 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154023137485 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963868310821 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.