While in twenty years there may be fewer cars on the road in my country, the rest of the world will tell a different story. In my opinion, on a global scale, twenty years from now there will be many more vehicles in use that there are today. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, the developing world is rapidly urbanizing, which means that more people than ever embark on a daily commute to their workplace. In the past, most people in developing nations engaged in subsistence labor near their home. In contrast, today people are more likely to live in an urban area. The apartment buildings that they inhabit are usually far from the factories where they work, which necessitates a long trip every day. My friend Lee is a good example of such a person. All of his ancestors worked on rice farms in northern China. Occasionally, they traveled short distances using pack animals, but for the most part lived out their entire lives fairly close to their birthplace. Lee, on the other hand, moved to a city last year to work in a steel plant and drives almost thirty kilometers from his home to the factory every day. All of his co-workers do the same, which is a pretty significant change compared to the past. I can see no indication that this trend will halt in the future. Indeed, it seems likely that even more people will share Lee’s experience.
Secondly, incomes are rising all over the world, which means that in the future automobiles will be affordable for even more people. In the past, owning a car was a privilege enjoyed only by those living in the developed world. Now, however, consumers in developing countries like China and India purchase millions of cars every year. My friend’s experience is also typical of this trend. At the moment Lee does not own his own car, but instead gets to work by carpooling with a neighbor. However, he dreams of owning a vehicle of his own. While it might make financial sense for him to continue carpooling or take public transportation, he views car ownership as symbol of affluence. Lee has even indicated to me that someday he hopes to own two automobiles, just like many people in the west.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that in the future there will be more vehicles on the road than there are today. This is because the world is rapidly urbanizing, and because rising incomes will open up even more markets for automobile companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'customers'' or 'customer's'?
Suggestion: customers'; customer's
...upposed to captivate even more and more customers attention and desire to purchase for a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 692, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cannot be denied that the human society is being reformed every time with higher...
^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tends'?
Suggestion: tends
... easily make roads congested. Hence, it tend to be wiped out completely. However, it...
^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to transport'.
Suggestion: to transport
...to make a suitable decision on choosing transporting methods.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, so, therefore, such as, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2259.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29039812646 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1547379941 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548009367681 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 729.9 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5766314244 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8846153846 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4230769231 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132150615736 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364378408289 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340931702001 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749536209695 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03806485948 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.